I see that there is a new study, called Job Sprawl Revisited: The Changing Geography of Metropolitan Employment, by Elizabeth Kneebone and published in April by the Brookings Institution, that examines the spatial location of jobs in metropolitan areas around the US. As I read the report, it highlights the real difficulty with achieving serious results in terms of building the green economy within the jurisdictions of cities.
The report says that among the more than 90 metropolitan areas, only three experienced greater job growth in the city than in the surrounding suburbs. Those three cities -- Chattanooga, Milwaukee, and Oxnard -- experienced greater job growth in their respective downtown areas. Virtually all other cities experienced some loss of jobs to areas -- municipalities -- outside of the central city.
This tells is a lot about the challenges that advocates of sustainable cities have to face in trying build new employment bases -- especially green jobs -- in existing cities. The implication is that cities will continue to have difficulties reducing their carbon footprints and other environmental impacts as long as people who live in major cities have to increasing leave the city to work.
What is most interesting to me is that, among all of the cities that claim to be pursuing sustainability, Chattanooga and Milwaukee are two cities where sustainability is really about economic development. So maybe this suggests that to grow the city-based green economic requires a laser-focus on this issue and nothing else. Just a thought. let me know what you think.